Apparently, this life-saving tool has been used internally by Microsoft for quite some time.
Still, now, Microsoft has officially taken up the torch by offering a more elegant way to handle connections to numerous RDP servers at once within its very own Remote Desktop Connection Manager. This groovy application from Avian Waves was well-deserving of the props it received. Remember: as an intelligent human being you are allowed to think that your organization security rules are stupid too high and advocate on this to your manager, but as en employee you are nevertheless supposed to observe them.Way back in 2008, we covered RD Tabs, a freeware RDP client alternative that answered the prayers of many a systems administrator for an easier way to manage multiple RDP sessions at once. Only if using a remote desktop protocol highly helps you for your tasks and you are not on an exposed job, the second choice should be considered. The more concerned by security, the more you should use option 1. The choice depends on you position and job in the organization.
report the fact to the security team, so that they can soon close what they will see as a security breach.What you describe is a hint that the dedicated rules for Google Chrome Remote Desktop are still not implemented in your corporate firewall. Security teams and firewall vendors then managed to identify them and forbid them again.īut each and every new tool has now to be identified and dedicated rules have to be added to the firewall configuration. Then came the time when most remote access tools just used HTTP/HTTPS in order not to be filtered by firewalls. In the beginning of security times, firewalls only blocked unwanted protocols and unwanted addresses. Long answer: Security is hard and securing accesses has to be constantly improved to fix new features. Short answer: because the security team is not aware of it.
0 kommentar(er)
